Jump To Navigation

Case Law

Smith v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Date Decided: October 23rd, 2010
Originally Filed in: Georgia (state)
Decided by: Georgia Court of Appeals (State)
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Judge: Ellington
Citation: 306 Ga. App. 897

Background:

Plaintiff, a railroad employee, was injured when he slipped and fell on a stairway while he was attending a mandatory safety meeting on his employer's premises.  Plaintiff brought this claim pursuant to the Federal Employees Liability Act, 45 USC § 51 et seq. (FELA), against his employer, CSX Transportation (CSX), alleging that he was injured because CSX breached its duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work.  Plaintiff's claim rested on two assertions: (1) that his fall was caused by a small puddle of liquid soap that was spilled on the stairway, and (2) that CSX violated an OSHA safety regulation because the stairs did not have the required non-slip coating as required by federal law.  At trial, the jury found for CSX.  Plaintiff appealed on the grounds that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury on the federal OSHA safety requirements.  


Issues:

Did the trial court error when it refused to instruct the jury on the federal OSHA safety requirements?  And, when must a trial court provide instruction to the jury regarding OSHA safety measures?


Held:
Yes, the appellate court held that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury regarding the potential violation of the federal OSHA safety regulation.  It is the duty of the trial court to charge the jury on the law applicable to the issues where there is any evidence on which to predicate the instructions.  A refusal to give a requested charge is error if the charge is a correct statement of the law and applicable to the issues involved.  Generally, evidence of noncompliance with OSHA regulations is admissible as evidence of an employer's negligence.  The court found: (1) that the OSHA regulation did apply to the building in question, and that (2) the plaintiff had presented evidence that the stairs in the CSX building were not of a nonslip finish and that, together with the soap spill, the condition of the stairs caused his fall. 

Comments:

It is the duty of the trial court to charge the jury on the law applicable to the issues where there is any evidence on which to predicate the instructions.


<< PREVNEXT >>

Smith

Overall issues discussed or touched upon by this case:
Free Case Evaluation Form Talk to a Lawyer Now
Please complete the math to prove you are not a robot:
=
in-depth overview FELA click here

LATEST CASE LAWS

In re Ricky Joe Jones, Cheryl Ann Jones, Debtors

Date Decided: Jan 25th, 2011
Decided By: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit(Bankruptcy) (Federal) read more

Leandrew Lewis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Date Decided: Mar 10th, 2011
Decided By: Ohio Southern District Court (Federal) read more

Subscribe to Case Law Feed

LATEST RAILROAD NEWS

Subscribe RSS
Attorneys Refer your cases here

Toll-Free: 800-773-6770
Local: 713-668-9999
Fax: 713-668-1980
1811 Bering Drive, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77057

Rio Grande Valley Office
(956) 664-9999
135 Paseo Del Padro, Suite 50
Edinburg, Texas 78539


Of Counsel Offices

David Lockard
15 W Highland Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19118

Fred Bremseth
Minnesota Office
601 Carlson Parkway
Suite 995
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305

Montana Office
100 North 27th Street
Suite 220
Billings, Montana 59101