Jump To Navigation

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to 
be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding 
your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your 
calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an
attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential 
information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has
 been established.



The materials contained within this Web site are provided for 
informational and educational purposes only. This Web site does not, nor 
is it intended to, create an attorney-client relationship between any 
person who views this site and Gordon & Elias, L.L.P. An
attorney- client relationship with us cannot be formed by reading the 
information on this Web site. The only way to become our client is 
through a mutual written agreement which you will be asked to sign. Any 
information that you send us in an e-mail message might not be 
confidential or privileged, and sending us an e-mail message will not 
make you a client of Gordon & Elias, L.L.P. If you are interested 
in having us represent you, you should call us and/or email us so that 
we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or 
able to accept professional responsibility. We cannot make this determination by e-mail communication but an email will allow us to call 
you and then we can make this determination. The toll free telephone
 number listed in this site ring directly to a licensed attorney from our 
office which is clearly listed in this Web site. We reserve the right to 
decline any representation.





This Web site is not soliciting clients and does not propose any type of 
transaction. You should not act or rely on any information at this Web
site without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of 
whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very 
important matters that should not solely be based on web sites or 
advertisements. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that 
should not be based solely upon the written information contained in 
this site or other information about the qualifications and experience
 of the firm and its attorneys. Readers of any information in this web
site should not act upon the information without first consulting with a 
lawyer who is experienced in evaluating and handling FELA claims,
 railroad accidents and/or personal injury claims. In some jurisdictions, 
this World Wide Web site may be considered to be advertising. Gordon & Elias, L.L.P. has tried to comply with all legal and ethical 
requirements in compiling this Web site. We do not want to represent
 clients based on their review of any portion of this Web site that does
 not comply with legal or ethical requirements. All states and 
jurisdictions have statutes that make it unlawful for any person to hold
 themselves out as an attorney unless admitted and licensed to practice 
as an attorney. Gordon & Elias, L.L.P. has members in the Texas,
Louisiana, Arkansas and D.C. bars. They also litigate in other state and
 federal courts throughout the United States pursuant to local rules of 
practice authorizing non-resident lawyers to participate in local cases.
We make every effort to comply with the legal and/or ethical
 requirements of each state and jurisdiction when we are asked to participate as trial counsel in a case in that locality. To the extent
 that the professional responsibility rules of any jurisdiction require them to designate a principal office or an attorney responsible for this 
Web site. Gordon & Elias, L.L.P. designates R.Todd Elias and his
 office in Houston, Texas. Some cases may be referred. Other cases may 
associate with other attorneys Generally for All States: The 
determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer 
are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon 
advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise.





Memberships and offices in legal fraternities and legal societies,
 technical and professional licenses, and memberships in scientific, 
technical and professional associations, and societies of law or field of
 practice do not mean that a lawyer is a specialist or expert in a field 
of law, nor do they mean that such a lawyer is necessarily any more
 expert or competent than any other lawyer. All potential clients are
 urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any
 lawyer being considered. This notice is required by rule of the Supreme 
Court of various states. For additional notices, please read below:





Alabama: No representation is made that the quality of the legal 
services to be performed is greater than the quality of the legal
 services performed by other lawyers.





Alaska: The Alaska Bar Association does not certify that an attorney 
possesses specialized training or skill in a particular field of law.





Colorado: Colorado does not certify attorneys as specialists in any 
field.





Delaware: Listing of areas of practice does not represent official
 certification as a specialist in those areas.





Hawaii: The State of Hawaii does not review or approve certifying 
organizations.





Illinois: The Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize
 certifications of specialties in the practice of law. The certificate,
 award, or recognition is not a requirement to practice law in Illinois.





Iowa: The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of 
a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based 
solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. "Notice to the
 Public: A description or indication of limitation of practice does not
 mean that any agency or board has certified such lawyer as a specialist
 or expert in an indicated field of law practice, nor does it mean that 
such lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other
 lawyer. All potential clients are urged to make their own independent 
investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. This notice 
is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa."



Minnesota: An attorney who is certified as a specialist under the
 National Board of Trial Advocacy (NBTA) may communicate the fact that
 the attorney is certified by the particular certifying agency as a
 specialist in the area of law involved.



Mississippi: Listing of area(s) of practice does not indicate any
 certification of expertise therein.





Missouri: Except references to patent and admiralty practice, "Neither
the Supreme Court of Missouri nor the Missouri Bar reviews or approves 
certifying organizations or specialist designations.





Nevada: Neither the State Bar of Nevada nor any agency of the State Bar 
has certified any lawyer identified here as a specialist or as an 
expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the
 lawyer's credentials and ability.





North Carolina: Representations of specialty do not indicate state
 certification of expertise.





Rhode Island: Rhode Island does not have a procedure for certification 
or recognition of specialization by lawyers.





South Dakota: Certification by the NBTA is approved in South Dakota by 
virtue of ABA accreditation. "Notice: For the general information of the 
public. Attorneys listing areas of practice...have not been certified by 
the State Supreme Court of South Dakota, or the state bar of South 
Dakota, as having any more experience or being any more competent in
these areas than any other attorney. All potential clients are urged to 
make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any attorney 
being considered.





Tennessee: Tennessee does not certify specialists in the law, and we do
 not claim certification in any listed area.

Texas: Steve Gordon is Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law by
the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Texas has a Rule to recognize 
private certifiers such as NBTA.



Washington: The Supreme Court of Washington does not recognize
 certification of specialties in the practice of law and the certificate, 
award, or recognition is not a requirement to practice law in the State
 of Washington.





The law offices of Gordon & Elias, L.L.P. do not offer any
 guarantee of case results. The cases mentioned in this site that are marked with an * are illustrative of some of the matters previously 
handled by the firm involving various areas of personal injury law. These illustrations, though based upon cases handled by this office, are 
representative only and should not be viewed as an assurance of a 
particular result in your case. Each case must stand on its own facts 
and circumstances.

Free Case Evaluation Form Talk to a Lawyer Now
Please complete the math to prove you are not a robot:
=
in-depth overview FELA click here

LATEST CASE LAWS

In re Ricky Joe Jones, Cheryl Ann Jones, Debtors

Date Decided: Jan 25th, 2011
Decided By: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit(Bankruptcy) (Federal) read more

Leandrew Lewis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Date Decided: Mar 10th, 2011
Decided By: Ohio Southern District Court (Federal) read more

Subscribe to Case Law Feed

LATEST RAILROAD NEWS

Subscribe RSS
Attorneys Refer your cases here

Toll-Free: 800-773-6770
Local: 713-668-9999
Fax: 713-668-1980
1811 Bering Drive, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77057

Rio Grande Valley Office
(956) 664-9999
135 Paseo Del Padro, Suite 50
Edinburg, Texas 78539


Of Counsel Offices

David Lockard
15 W Highland Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19118

Fred Bremseth
Minnesota Office
601 Carlson Parkway
Suite 995
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305

Montana Office
100 North 27th Street
Suite 220
Billings, Montana 59101